Posts Tagged ‘Vaccine’

Top 10 Annoying Comments to Parents of Children with Autism

Sunday, July 24th, 2016

MeasureParents of children with special needs are frequently challenged by friends, relatives, acquaintances, social and other media. Sometimes, it is well-meaning advice, but there are comments that can be especially thoughtless, or even unkind.

Here are the most outstanding remarks that families have experienced, and their answers (or thoughts), mostly delivered with grace and love:

10. Polar white littleGod only gives us what we can handle.

Polar Black littleWe have no choice but to carry on. Should that make us feel better?

9. Polar white littleWhat is your autistic child’s special talent?

Polar Black littleIs that because, if you’re autistic, you must have one?

8. Polar white littleWe don’t want to get him that same gift every year… what else can we give?

Polar Black littleHow about, what he really likes, not what makes you feel better?

Polar white little7. You’re wrong, ignorant, and/or misinformed. Childhood vaccinations have been proven safe.

Polar Black littleNot for our child. Not for all children. And, I’ll bet you wouldn’t say that if your child had ASD.

Polar white little6. That gluten free- casein free, specific carbohydrate, paleo, etc. diet is stupid.

Polar Black littleYou didn’t ask if it worked.

Polar white little5. Did you see Rain Man?

Polar Black littleIs that how you think the child will grow up? That was last century.

Polar white little4. Is your child high functioning?

Polar Black littleIs yours?

Polar white little3. We don’t want to invite your child to the birthday party… we don’t think that he will fit in.

Polar Black littleWho is uncomfortable, the parents or kids? Could you be any crueler?

Polar white little2. I heard it’s not really an epidemic, we just called it ‘retardation’ in the past.

Polar Black littleA condition whose prevalence rises from less than 1/2,500 to 1/68 in a few decades is an epidemic.

Polar white little1. Can’t you handle your (misbehaving) child?

Polar Black littleHe’s autistic, you #*$%&$][ ! (That’s in the thought bubble).

Life is not black or white. Neurodiversity is here. As we understand this phenomenon called ASD, we learn about how all of our brains work.

In the meantime, let’s become more educated
and kind to each other.

Acetaminophen And Autism

Sunday, July 10th, 2016
tylenol9

A Tylenol® by any other name; including Xumadol, Paracetamol, Tirol, Calpol, Panadol, etc, etc.

Evidence supporting an another pharmaceutical connection to autism was recently presented in a study entitled, Acetaminophen use in pregnancy and neurodevelopment: attention function and autism spectrum symptoms, which appeared in The International Journal of Epidemiology.

Given our current state of ignorance, support, rejection, and often, polarizing opinions have already surfaced.

The Present Study
The authors concluded, “Prenatal acetaminophen exposure was associated with a greater number of autism spectrum symptoms in males and showed adverse effects on attention-related outcomes for both genders…”

Recent Supporting Evidence
2014: Acetaminophen use during pregnancy, behavioral problems, and hyperkinetic disorders
Conclusion – “Maternal acetaminophen use during pregnancy is associated with a higher risk for HKDs and ADHD-like behaviors in children.”

2014: Associations between Acetaminophen Use during Pregnancy and ADHD Symptoms Measured at Ages 7 and 11 Years
Conclusion – These findings strengthen the contention that acetaminophen exposure in pregnancy increases the risk of ADHD-like behaviors.

2013: Prenatal paracetamol exposure and child neurodevelopment: a sibling-controlled cohort
Conclusion – “Children exposed to long-term use of paracetamol during pregnancy had substantially adverse developmental outcomes at 3 years of age.”

Opposing Opinions
2016: Use of acetaminophen (paracetamol) during pregnancy and the risk of autism spectrum disorder in the offspring.
Summary – “… the empirical data are very limited, but whatever empirical data exist do not support the suggestion that the use of acetaminophen during pregnancy increases the risk of autism in the offspring.”

Dr. James Cusack, research director of Autistica, “…insisted there was “not sufficient evidence” to back the suggestion. “The results presented are preliminary in their nature, and so should not concern families or pregnant women.”

The ‘experts’ say, “Don’t even worry about those studies”
claiming a relationship between Autism and Acetaminophen.
Really?
Where is the proof that it’s SAFE?

Discussion
First available in US in the 1950s, Tylenol Elixir for children became even more popular 30 years later when aspirin was reported as a contributing factor to an often fatal Liver – CNS disorder (Reye’s Syndrome). Interestingly, the authors of a 2007 literature review wrote, “The suggestion of a defined cause-effect relationship between aspirin intake and Reye syndrome in children is not supported by sufficient facts.”

Throughout the globe, there are over 100 names for acetaminophen. Plus, it is an ingredient in hundreds of other over-the-counter remedies. It is widespread and readily available. The increased use of this chemical tracks with the explosion of autism into the 21st century.

The medication can cause liver problems and freely crosses the placenta. There are studies that link pretreatment with Tylenol to address fever associated with childhood inoculations, and an increased risk of ASD. Furthermore, the mechanism of action includes the creation of oxidative stress, which is thought to play a significant role in autism.

Conclusion
What about occasional use? The present research concluded, “These associations seem to be dependent on the frequency of exposure.” However, until further investigations are performed, there could be specific times in pregnancy that are more sensitive than others, regardless of the dose.

A single, relatively uncomplicated question – whether there is an association between Tylenol and ASD – needs to be answered. This is but one example of why numerous other substances in our poisoned environment are so difficult to pin down. And, forget about combinations of substances. Why is the establishment so quick to point out the weakness of the present research, and declare that, “Everything is fine?”

Until more information is collected, conservative advice is warranted. Acetaminophen usage in pregnancy should be placed high on the ‘This Deserves Further Study’ list of important autism associations.

Vaccination Redux

Sunday, April 17th, 2016

TheAutismDoctor has been asked to weigh in on the recent media attention regarding the film Vaxxed, which was scheduled, but not shown, at this year’s Tribeca Film Festival.

Robert De Niro, who helped organize the exposition, announced that he has an 18 year-old son with autism, and felt that the point of view presented in the documentary was important enough to explore. However, he decided to pull the film because the controversy is so heated that it deterred the public’s enjoyment of the rest of the event.

Do Vaccinations cause Autism?
The topic has been covered in this venue over 35 times, so I’m fairly certain that another protestation will confer little additional sanity.

Regardless of the volume and frequency with which Jenny McCarthy, Robert De Niro or Dr. Udell voice the opinion that we are not against childhood inoculations, ‘anti-vaccination’ is usually the way that the information is characterized. Opinions are either, “All or none, for or against, pro-science or anti-vaccination, educated or ignorant, healthy or dangerous.” Such points of view offer no middle ground and so this dispute won’t go away any time soon.

Discussion
I posed the following question to the ‘pro-vax’ father of a 6-month old, “You are asked to enter your baby into a formal study in which there are two groups.”

Group A – Present Schedule

Start at birth (Hepatitis B in hospital)
Fever OK (give Tylenol)
Mild illness OK
9 or more components at once OK
Negative previous reaction OK
‘Make up shots’ (for missed doses) OK
Other medical conditions OK
Development not on track OK

Group B – Other factors considered

Wait to begin until infant is clearly healthy
No shots if child is sick
Fewer components at each time
No pretreatment with Tylenol
Medical evaluation if previous problems
Appropriate testing if medically unstable (e.g. frequent infections, premature, GERD, eczema, asthma, abnormal stooling…)

Dad’s answer? “The safe one!” Really? Is that the one that the ‘scientists’ and government say is all right? And by the way, even if a physician might answer the hypothetical by responding, “Group A is perfectly fine,” their partner would probably protest, “Are you crazy? Not my kid!”

When that scenario is too cumbersome to recite, I pose another question. “Which is a more reasonable statement? ALL vaccinations are good for ALL children ALL of the time,” or “SOME inoculations might not be good for SOME toddlers in SOME situations?”

If the answer is the latter, it begs the question, “Which ones, when, under what conditions?”

Conclusion
Childhood vaccinations have been a true victory for modern medicine. They have prevented a variety of devastating diseases suffered by so many for millennia.

This movie, subtitled, From Cover-up to Catastrophe certainly stokes the controversy, as does its outspoken lightning rod, Andrew Wakefield.

No matter how frequently, dogmatic or pedantic the ‘Vaxxers’ pontificate, this polarization will continue until we understand more abut the present autism epidemic. Once that diagnosis is accurately understood and described, ‘real’ science demands independent, prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind crossover studies of each and every component of the modern protocol to prove safety and efficacy.

Response to Inaction by US Task Force on Autism

Saturday, August 8th, 2015

August 8, 2015
This week, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force on screening for autism disorder in young children recommended that more research needs to be performed before they can propose the institution of a formal program.

In a 2011 special article in Pediatrics, the authors concluded, “… we believe that we do not have enough sound evidence to support the implementation of a routine population-based screening program for autism.” That same year, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended integrating such tools as a preventive measure.

Screening Today
The most popular screening tool, the Denver Scale, was introduced 40 years ago and last revised in 1992. It was invented at a time when the most serious childhood problems were mental retardation and cerebral palsy.

According to one study, “… the test has been criticized to be unreliable in predicting less severe or specific problems.” The author of the DDST has replied, “… it is not a tool of final diagnosis, but a quick method to process large numbers of children in order to identify those that should be further evaluated.” Like the many scientific tools available to screen for autism.

Autism Screening Tools
The CDC has developed a detailed schematic mechanism for diagnostic screening. “Myths About Developmental Screening” included these facts:

… today sound screening measures exist. Many screening measures have sensitivities and specificities greater than 70%.
•Training requirements are not extensive for most screening tools…
•Many screening instruments take less than 15 minutes to administer…
•Parents’ concerns are generally valid and are predictive of developmental delays.

Success of Early Screening
Fifteen years ago, a Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Child Neurology Societystated, “Early identification of children with autism and intensive, early intervention during the toddler and preschool years improves outcome for most young children with autism.”

The effects of intellectual functioning and autism severity on outcome of early behavioral intervention for children with autism, published in 2007, concluded “… These findings emphasize the importance of early intensive intervention in autism and the value of pre-intervention cognitive and social interaction levels for predicting outcome.”

A 2008 study noted, “Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated positive effects in both short-term and longer term studies. The evidence suggests that early intervention programs are indeed beneficial for children with autism, often improving developmental functioning and decreasing maladaptive behaviors and symptom severity at the level of group analysis.”

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of an Intervention for Toddlers With Autism, first published in 2009, demonstrated, “… the efficacy of a comprehensive developmental behavioral intervention for toddlers with ASD for improving cognitive and adaptive behavior and reducing severity of ASD diagnosis. Results of this study underscore the importance of early detection of and intervention in autism.”

A Systematic Review of Early Intensive Intervention for Autism Spectrum Disorders, in 2011, “… resulted in some improvements in cognitive performance, language skills, and adaptive behavior skills in some young children with ASDs…”

Research in 2014 at UC Davis demonstrated that 6/7 high-risk infants (6 to 15 months old), “…caught up in all of their learning skills and their language by the time they were 2 to 3.” Therapy was provided by instructing parents on interventions that could be done at home.

Discussion
Dr. David Grossman, task force vice chairman and pediatrician, said that while early treatment is promising for the more severely affected, that hasn’t been studied in children who have mild symptoms that may be caught only in screening. So – don’t screen at all?

The USPSTF in question lists potential harms as including, “… time, effort, and anxiety associated with further testing after a positive screening result, particularly if confirmatory testing is delayed because of resource limitations. Behavioral treatments are generally thought to not be associated with significant harms but can place a large time and financial burden on the family.”

A common theme among most of the parents who are interviewed about the manner in which their child’s autism diagnosis was handled, is the wish that the pediatrician had been more knowledgeable and forthcoming about developmental red flags. The cost of autism runs into millions of extra dollars over the lifetime of individuals who continue to be affected.

When it comes to all-vaccinations-for-all, anything related to ebola, guns not-under-control, poisons in our environment, etc., the government has rarely demonstrated reluctance to recommend. When it comes to children’s health, what happened to erring on the side of caution?

The task force VP said, “… of course you should screen if the parent is concerned.”
IF THE PARENT IS CONCERNED?

Shouldn’t it be the doctor???

Docs, Glocks and Autism

Thursday, July 30th, 2015

gunMiami Herald
July 28, 2015
Appeals court upholds doctor-patient gun law

According to the article, “The law subjects healthcare providers to possible sanctions, including fines and loss of license, if they discuss or record information in a patient’s chart about firearms safety that a medical board later determined was not “relevant” or was “unnecessarily harassing.” The law did not define these terms.”

The law did not define these terms
It has been reported that U.S. Circuit Judge Gerald Tjoflat, the author of the majority opinion, understands that, in a patient at-risk for suicide, this might be a valid medical concern.

How about this case?

A fifteen year-old male who suffers from moderate-to-severe autism (or any other medical – psychiatric condition), takes Zoloft for aggressive behaviors, perseverates on violent video games, and doesn’t seem to grasp the line between fantasy and reality.

Would it be fair to say that a discussion by the physician with the parents about weapons in the home is appropriate?

The risk factors

  • The patient’s sex.
  • The person’s age.
  • Medication(s) use. There is even a ‘Black Box’ warning on SSRIs about the increased possibility of suicide.
  • The predilection for violent video games related to behaviors.
  • The teen’s inability to discern reality vs. fantasy. When asked, “Who is your best friend,” for example, one patient responded with the name of person who he had never met.
  • Constant bickering with parents over school.
  • A loaded gun in the house.

Discussion
Such a situation might be equally as valid when a patient experiences conditions other than ASD. Indeed, people ‘on the spectrum’ are probably less likely to act with outward aggression. Certainly, a discussion about elopement is absolutely a necessity in the face of autism, as are questions about a pool safety and the ability to swim.

Surely, there are a gaggle of gun-toting attorneys who can poke holes in my case. After all, I’m just a healthcare provider.

The lawyers representing the doctors got it wrong. This is not about the first amendment rights of physicians to discuss the issue of guns. This is about public safety. And, let’s face it, when it comes to vaccinations-for-all, as an example, there’s no problem protecting the herd.

Perhaps just as certain, is the possibility that, should a shooting death occur in this scenario, a lineup of litigators would appear on the radar screen, accusing the (ir)responsible doctor of not taking the obvious and necessary steps to prevent such a tragedy. “An Accident Waiting to Happen,” might be the headline.

Conclusion
This is an insane law that supports the NRA’s unyielding position about the rights of gun ownership. It is proof of how corrupted our system has become, due the superabundance of lobbying money.

Gun control is what we need, in the face all the senseless shooting deaths by too many young men, who obviously have mental challenges. However bizarre, it is a standing law that has now been upheld by the Florida Court of Appeals.

More information will be required to illuminate the holes that are created by this imprecise lawyer-speak.

Addendum:

http://www.aol.com/article/2016/07/27/two-thirds-of-americans-ok-if-doctors-ask-about-guns/21439181/

Cali-Vaccination Law

Sunday, July 5th, 2015

Senate Bill 227, mandating childhood vaccinations, will take effect in California in 2016, joining 36 other states that no longer allow an exemption for personal or religious beliefs. Non-compliant families will not be able to use licensed daycare facilities, in-home daycare, private or public preschools, and after-school care programs.

Children who are not up-to-date will be required to home school. Also, the legislature may add any additional vaccines that they deem necessary. Parents are left with few viable alternatives.

Exemptions
Ironically, unvaccinated students with IEPs will still be able to access those programs.
Those with a preexisting personal exemption may continue until the next school year.
Parents requesting a medical exception must provide a physician’s statement that details which ‘shots’ are not OK, and the reason(s) for non-compliance.

The Government Doesn’t Always Get it Right
According to the Innocence Project, 330 post-conviction DNA exonerations have occurred since 1989. Twenty people were on death row and the average length of time served per exoneree was 14 years. Whoops.
The CDC keeps dropping the ball with the flu vaccines. After admitting that the 2015 ‘shot’ is ineffective, as in previous years, the universal message given to the public from the government and mainstream media was to “get the flu shot anyway.” There is evidence that some flu vaccines could make things worse.
As demonstrated in the case of antibiotic overuse, the FDA can’t regulate even when scientific research is convincing. Important practical issues, such as incorrect vaccine labelling and storage have never been adequately addressed.

Future studies may identify specific individuals, such as those with genetic Copy Number Variations, G-I, and immune system difficulties, who are susceptible to vaccine injury. Differences have recently been identified regarding the effects of medications on men vs. women, infants vs. adults, and there are now even individualized chemo treatments. In medicine, one size does not fit all.

The herd has been protected so far.
Even though the number of cases increased sharply in 2014, there were still less than 700 reported measles and 1150 mumps cases. Many patients had  previously been vaccinated, or were too young to get a shot. Worldwide, there were ~ 400 cases of polio reported in 2013. Working together (mutually beneficial relationships), drug companies and governments have done a fairly effective job.
With CDC surveillance and public health reporting, outbreaks can be detected using appropriate testing with inoculations to avert tragedy.

Based on an incidence of 1/68 children, the number of patients with autism equalled nearly 60,000 in the US.

Conclusions
There doesn’t seem to a great deal of wiggle room for parents who remain convinced that an inoculation altered the course for their typically developing child. Does a previous child with autism after a shot count? How about those who are already not developing normally? Many children have fevers and diarrhea following a vaccination, so that is significant. Should febrile seizures be a concern? Does a child with Tuberous Sclerosis who does not show signs of autism (yet) count?

An already elevated titer against a disease seems to be a contraindication to revaccination. There are patients with high or low white blood cell counts, so this might become a possible possible temporary exemption.

Finding a physician willing to assist in the process is one part of the journey. Crossing t’s and dotting i’s to adhere to regulations will take time for already-resource strapped families.

The change in the law is a knee-jerk reaction based on inadequate scientific information, conflicts of interest from those who are supposed to be protecting us, and presents an unnecessary barrier for thoughtful, intelligent, concerned parents.

For many parents, homeschool dot-coms may be the most preferable alternative.

To Vaccinate or Not to Vaccinate?

Saturday, February 7th, 2015

The measles outbreak that started in Disneyland has generated a fair amount of activity at The Child Development Center lately.

Many of our patients are either un- or under- vaccinated, according to the Vaccine Gods, so an increase in a preventable childhood disease in the U.S. is a very important healthcare issue.

In response to the media stories, and with the intention of addressing parents’ concerns, The Center emailed our patients.

The advice that was offered:
a. If the child has never had a vaccination, it is best to “bite the bullet” and go ahead with an MMR. We’re in the middle of an outbreak and it’s a very small world.

b. If the child has been previously vaccinated for MMR, you could get  “measles-mumps-rubella titers”. This is a blood test to determine if the child is still immune to the diseases, so it may be OK to hold off for now.

There were a variety of interesting responses.
Parent: “Thanks, Dr. Udell, for the heads up.”
Dr. U: You’re welcome. I’m just a messenger. Parents are the ones who have to make the final decision.

Parent: “What if the child has antibodies to eggs (allergy)?”
Dr. U: That is a big problem. I would look over the most recent laboratory tests and, depending on the child’s present state of health, and other findings, possibly still have to recommend. For what it’s worth, two of the products are actually grown on chick embryo, and almost all of our yolk-and/or-white-positive patients are negative to chicken. The German measles strain is grown on lung tissue derived from human fetus. We don’t test for that.

Parent: “Can’t you break up the shots?
Dr. U: No, the company that used to produce separates stopped years ago.

Parent: “My child was severely damaged by that shot. I’m surprised that you made this recommendation.”
Dr. U: It’s situational ethics, in a medical setting. I sympathize with your plight. Not only is there conflicting research; cases, such as yours, are completely ignored. Nevertheless, measles carries a 1/1000 chance of encephalitis (brain infection). 

Discussion:
After listening to so many complaints of proximate injury to an inoculation, it seemed that the best advice was to hold off vaccinating until the child improved, and/or the cause(s) of inflammation was discovered. There was little evidence of a rise in disease, so I felt less concern for the ‘herd’ than the family sitting in my office. The plan was to vaccinate a healthier child in 1-2 years, utilizing a judicious make-up protocol, if the parents agreed.

Each family will address this news differently, and act on their decision based upon what they consider as their child’s best interest. Questions and concerns persist. An epidemiologist just published a York Times editorial suggesting that there would be increased compliance if it were more difficult to obtain an exemption.

The line between the ‘good of the many’ and the ‘good of the one’ has shifted. Once the seal is broken, so to speak, and fewer than ~90% of the susceptible population is protected, there can be no accurate prediction of whether/where/when/how severe another outbreak will occur. The choice returns to the ‘good of the one’, so prevention is paramount.

The reality is that, if the AMA, AAP, FDA and CDC would express less dogma, become more sympathetic to those who claim injury, make fewer errors, and perform prospective studies to demonstrate efficacy and universal safety, parents wouldn’t be forced to make such a crucial decision on their own.

Autism, Inoculations, and Fantasyland

Sunday, January 25th, 2015

Recent news about the increase in measles that has sprung up in California, has brought about the usual media finger-pointing, claiming that the cause is unvaccinated children whose parents unnecessarily worry about the risk of autism.

As documented in my previous posts on this topic, this physician believes in the value of those twentieth century miracles. Nonetheless, a lingering question remains, “Are all of the vaccinations safe and effective for all young children?”

The Three Main Reasons for the Measles ‘Outbreak’

Lack of Knowledge

We really don’t know the reason(s) for the newest episode. The increase may have little to do with lack of compliance by anti-vaccination zealots. Many of the infected individuals were Disney workers who had probably already been vaccinated, and were no longer immune. Plus, the venue is an international attraction, with visitors from all over.

The Wakefield Effect – Any time there is any story involving vaccines and ASD, the controversial and now-infamous British study that implicated measles virus as a possible cause, seems to mar all perception and reason. Media pundits are quick to avail themselves of that ill-fated research.

Conventional medicine is still debating whether increases are merely due to changes in diagnostic criteria. Every week a new association pops up; including maternal weight, paternal age, environment and toxins, stress, and circumcision. If compliance is the issue, certainly such confusion shakes one’s faith in the ‘science’.

Polarization

The experts would have a great deal more validity and success, if they could add more understanding and kindness to their approach. Those who question the status quo are considered kooky, ignorant and ill-informed. That creates more polarization, with fewer parents possibly choosing to vaccinate.

Pro-vaccination declarations are rarely equivocal, and conclusions no longer contain the statement, “The topic deserves further study.” Anti-vaccination supporters suffer a similar shortcoming, and conspiracy theories are a scientific distraction. There doesn’t seem to be any compromise position.

Issues, such as the recent CDC whistle-blower case, or reports of safety violations have not been adequately addressed.

There still aren’t any definitive, prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind crossover studies with long-term outcomes evaluating various vaccine schedules to document safety. Holistic medicine is frequently chastised by the establishment for such an omission in alternative protocols.

Lack of Confidence & Trust

A great deal of money is handed to drug manufacturers to manage these vaccination programs. Concerns abound about whether large multi-national companies always have our best interests in mind.

The Flu vaccine fiascos that permeate each winter do not engender a great deal of confidence about how our medical establishment handles the inoculation issue.

The government continues to send out inaccurate and conflicting messages regarding our public health. Antibiotics in our food are proven unsafe, but the practice continues. There were 2 cases of ebola and Congress appointed a ‘czar’, but they couldn’t confirm a Surgeon General.

Public trust in the FDA and CDC has been eroded by frequent lapses in judgement and execution.

Conclusion:
The vast majority of the scientific literature is quite insistent that there is no relationship between the present vaccine schedule and ASD. To all of the experts, ‘true’ scientists, and colleagues – I get it!

That fact remains that there are too many parents who have noted developmental regression proximate to a childhood vaccination. They deserve better answers.

Five Steps to Improving Vaccination Compliance

Saturday, October 4th, 2014

In a recent Wall Street Journal editorial, “The Anti-Vaccination Epidemic”, Dr. Paul I-never-met-a-vaccine-I-didn’t-like Offit whined about the ignorant public, The Wakefield Effect, “fringe” doctors, foolish families and the “inaccurate” media. The subtitle, Whooping cough, mumps and measles are making an alarming comeback, thanks to seriously misguided parents, sums up the position of Dr. He-ain’t-Jonas-Salk.

The mainstream approach to the childhood vaccination-autism controversy is that there is no blame on the part of the ‘experts’ or the doctors who follow the pharmaceutical industry’s dogma. The logic that says,”If you knew how bad those diseases were, you would believe,” doesn’t work on me. I have lived through many previous epidemics.

The major problem is trust. Confidence in the government is at an all-time low. More than half of the population doesn’t trust the FDA. That bureaucracy can’t manage to stop antibiotics in our food, even when there is evidence of negative effects.

The CDC has similar problems. The current whistle-blower incident, involving questionable data inclusion/exclusion affecting an association with MMR and autism in African-American males, hardly discourages vaccine skeptics. Furthermore, the present viral epidemics appear to reinforce public fear about the competence of that prestigious organization. It was media scrutiny that prompted investigators to secure the living quarters of the Texas ebola patient!

How to Improve Vaccine Compliance:

1. It is difficult to believe that an agency has ‘learned from its mistakes’ when they don’t even own up to them. There have been problems in the past. A neurologic illness has been related to some vaccines, and the Swine Flu ‘epidemics’ were debacles. Public trust would best be furthered by declaring, “We understand what happened and those issues are behind us,” if it’s true. If it isn’t, caution is warranted.

2. Pediatricians need to give better advice. Often, the doctor who professes vaccine safety also missed the child’s ASD diagnosis. Parents are not “bad”, “ignorant”, or misinformed. They simply don’t agree, and professionals should be armed with the facts, not paternalistic warnings.

3. Doctors need to listen. A previous sibling or relative with autism is cause for concern. Fevers or illness that followed other vaccinations should be highlighted in the chart, not dismissed. Co-morbidities, such as eczema or asthma need to be controlled, before adding to the immunologic load.

4. Research that challenges the norm warrants evaluation, not immediate dismissal. Instead of proclaiming the autism-vaccination question a dead issue, confidence would be elevated by experts who calmly declare, “That study deserves further attention.”

5. A practitioner’s willingness to agree to an individual family’s reasonable request to adjust the number and frequency of ‘shots’ will be met with more, not less, compliance. Furthermore, kicking an insubordinate family out of the practice is neither ethical nor helpful.

The present strategy of threats and intimidation is not working to decrease the number of families who either choose an alternative schedule, or the risky position of total noncompliance.

Further understanding and kindness is the best prescription for a more successful approach.

Miracle Mineral Solution Treatment for Autism

Saturday, May 24th, 2014

I hadn’t really expected MMS to gain any traction as a viable autism treatment. It seems complicated and scary, and the FDA first issued a warning about it four years ago. Perhaps there is no measurable re-emergence, but it seemed so when I attended the Autism Today Second Conference in Miami this week.

I sat among eighty mostly-bewildered parents, representing children who are so affected that they are attracted to outlier theories and treatments. This is largely because the information supplied by the conventional medical community is so woefully inaccurate, incomplete, and unproductive for many patients.

Due to some scheduling glitches, this conference ended up focusing on the very controversial topic of MMS. The treatment was explained by Ms. Kerri Rivera, “a biomedical consultant for an autism clinic in Puerto Vallarta,” and mother of recovered child. Her experience was then authenticated by Dr. Andreas Ludwig Kalcker, inventor of “The Parasite Protocol,” which is an essential element in the therapy.

The Chlorine Dioxide Protocol is not about bleaching your kid. That was the first message. Well, it’s not about making your intestines white, but the word does mean “to sterilize.” Anyway, that refers to sodium hypochlorite, according to Ms. Rivera, not the chemical that MMS is utilizing. In that sense, it’s not about dipping your child in Clorox. Except that Chlorine dioxide is used in “stripping textiles and industrial water treatment,” and it does involve purging and cleaning the “excess of pathogens.”

  • The diet – organic vegetables and meats. GF/CF/SF/sugar free (especially fruits).
  • Supplements – Stay away from all anti-oxidants.
  • Main Ingredient – Ocean water and acid (lemon juice, e.g.), to make a dilute solution of Chlorine Dioxide.
  • How it is administered – Doses and administration depending on a pre-established protocol, plus alterations depending on symptoms and response to treatment. In the gut, it is supposed to remove the biofilm and so expose organisms that get flushed through the G-I tract. Breathed into the lungs, it addresses asthma and bronchitis. The cutaneous route helps eliminate bad skin cooties and detoxify. Enemas and rectal suppositories to directly address lower intestinal issues. There is also and Eye and Ear spray form.
  • What happens – The elimination of bad bacteria (and, admittedly some good ones – but they have a product to fix that), viruses, fungi, and worms. Lots of worms. Plenty of worm pics. Worms that no laboratory in the world, apparently, can document.
  • Acceptable additional treatments listed as HBOT, chemical chelation and GcMAF, probiotics, l-carnosine, carnitine, plant fatty acids, GABA, digestive enzymes, tryptophan, DMG and TMG (the last 2 are anti-oxidant precursors).
  • She claims to have helped over 6000 families, and 131 cases of patients losing the diagnosis.

The ‘Parasite protocol’ was presented by Dr. Andreas Ludwig Kalcker, who recommends Chlorine Dioxide treatment.  He lists his credentials as, “… first licensed in economics and later in biophysics and alternative health (Ph.D).” Addendum – I found other evidence that he received a Doctor of Philosophy in Alternative Medicine and Natural biophysics from the Open University of Advanced Sciences Inc., which is a fake diploma mill based in Florida, but lists Spain as the main address.
Although his German accent is compelling, the science that he presented was not. He listed the symptoms of parasites and noted similarities to many autistic behaviors (?cause and effect?). He claims that his key discovery was that regressive autism is due to “Parasitological Vaccinosis“. That term describes toxins that are later released by parasites in susceptible children who become vaccinated.
“Dr.” K made many grand overstatements, using real research papers that only prove the one point, frequently mixing apples and oranges. Slides such as “Larval migraines induced by vaccine,” not only lack a scientific citation, I couldn’t find any match over the entire Internet.

In the Q&A session, I asked a simple question, “131 ‘cured’ is the numerator, what is the denominator?” This resulted in Ms. Rivera and Dr. Kalcker blustering about how that number couldn’t be documented, and how it wasn’t really important. That begs the comment, “Well, if you don’t know how many have been treated in this manner, you also wouldn’t really know how many have experienced significant negative reactions.”

As expressed by top autism researcher, Dr. Martha Herbert, I do not believe that parents who attend these conferences are “gullible, dangerous, and/or don’t love their children, and the people who pass them off are snake oil salesmen.” I was there to learn about new ways to approach our most resistant patients, not to criticize. Advertising MMS in this manner is not the way to go about proposing innovative and controversial treatments. It promotes The Wakefield Effect.

Dismissing conventional medicine as being completely ignorant and challenging treatments from all sides takes strong scientific proof. Proof of concept in animal models and proof of efficacy and safety in appropriate human treatment trials. To be specific: no, I would not recommend this treatment for my patients. There is too much missing information. A few pictures of recovered children and parental testimonials should not sway a prudent professional.

At The Child Development Center, we have improved the lives of many of our patients by addressing and treating G-I health with a proven, safe, well-tolerated protocol. Nutritional status must be evaluated, treated and monitored. With appropriate behavioral therapies, child development gets on the right track.

For successful autism treatment, each piece in the puzzle has to fit into the bigger picture.

Categories Archives Links Contact Us

Brian D. Udell MD
6974 Griffin Road
Davie
FL 33314
Office phone – 954-873-8413
Fax – 954-792-2424

Email bdumd@childdev.org
Copyright © TheAutismDoctor.com 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015
All Rights Reserved