Archive for the ‘Chelation’ Category

Parents Helping Other Parents Battling Autism and ADHD

Sunday, May 21st, 2017

The First Warrior Parent
More than 5 decades ago, Dr. Bernard Rimland observed his son’s unusual development, and was determined to understand the cause and treatment of a rare condition called autism. So began a more modern view of the condition, which addressed the tide of children who began appearing with similar challenges. His work started a movement that has ultimately morphed into The Medical Academy of Pediatric Special Needs.

At that time, the predominant cause of autism, promulgated by self-taught psychologist and media darling, Bruno Bettleheim, was the ‘refrigeratory mom’ theory. His experiences in Nazi concentration camps led him to believe that a lack of love in their environment could cause a child to turn off the road to typical human development. Dr. Rimland said, “No way,” and along with other like-minded professionals created biomedical workups with useful interventions.

It took another three decades until Jenny McCarthy popularized that viewpoint, with her outspoken experiences, fighting the medical profession to get proper care for her son. What progress has science made since that battle? Only a few brave professional parent practitioners, such as Drs. Dan Rossignol, Julie Buckley, Anju Usman and Nancy O’Hara, have taken up the slack.

Advancing the Combat
So, in that vacuum has arisen a number of other parent warriors. These are intelligent, dedicated, caring individuals, who have researched the data and applied various treatments to their children, often, trying it out on themselves first. They have observed various amounts of success, depending on their child’s specific difficulties. Some achieve remarkable results, and wish to pay it forward.

One day recently, I got into an interesting email discussion about Transcranial, Red/Near-Infrared Light-Emitting Diode Therapy. That determined Dad found a difference in his own clarity by moving the light from front to back. Wasn’t that OK to try on his child?

Just a few hours later, I had a conversation with a Mom who has been witnessing positive results using Ionized water. Her child was making significant progress, and this generous lady wanted to offer the product – for free – to other parents. “We can help so many more!”

One father has observed improvement with a particular form of Acai berry. Other parents have found good results with MMS, CBD, THC+CBD, Sauna, and Essential Oils, among other treatments.

Few Victors, So Far
I was telling this story to an experienced Mom, and she declared, “See how desperate we are!” Those who vilify Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s heresy over the possible danger of some childhood vaccination protocols ought to consider Dr. Leo Kanner’s role 80 years ago, which established a misguided psychological point of view.

Modern medicine has implicated genetic problems, but doctors fail to order appropriate testing; brain abnormalities, without getting diagnostic labs; and environmental factors, yet there exists little research to establish therapeutic strategies.

New Strategies
The reality is that, both professionals and parents, are experimenting on the children. Without proper studies we cannot know eventual outcomes, of even the most ‘benign’ interventions. We are now learning about conditions that are not only carried from one generation to the next, but 2 generations away. Real science takes time.

A common factor among many of the treatments that I encounter is some form of gut adjustment. Many of the specific supplements help while they are being administered and do not appear to be toxic. However, much of the research has been documented only in other species or conditions, and requires additional scrutiny.

Advice to Medics
Parents, who see progress in their own child, then in others, simply want to guide more families in the same boat. But, you are all NOT in the same boat. Some kids are older or younger, some girls or boys, others with metabolic, genetic, immunologic, gut conditions and various combinations that are different from child to child. SAFE is not SAFE for all, as we have learned from the vaccination dogma.

Even those strategies that work may require additional patient evaluation and testing. If a parent sees untoward effects, watch closely for such important signs, such as dehydration or an extensive rash. By discussing these interventions with a functional doctor, a child stands the best chance for advancement.

‘Alternative medicine’ strives to be inclusive, but the response by professionals to adopt non-conventional strategies may take a bit longer to take hold, as evidence becomes more clear. We are fighting on the same side.

Speech Apraxia and Autism Misbehavior

Sunday, May 7th, 2017

This week (May ’17), Penn State researchers claimed to have disproven a generally-accepted premise with an article is entitled, Tantrums are Not Associated with Speech or Language Deficits in Preschool Children with Autism.

The Study
The authors retrieved information from a previous data collection, which was not intended for this purpose, and reviewed 240 cases. Children, who were 15 to 71 months old, “… whose mental age was sufficient for verbal communication but who lacked speech did not have more tantrums than children with adequate speech. In fact, children with an expressive language age at or above 24 months had more tantrums than children whose speech skills were below 24 months.

Their conclusion is the exact opposite of what we all suspect. “Our findings and those of others do not support the belief that preschool children with autism have tantrums because they cannot speak or because their speech is difficult to understand.”

Discussion
In autism, THE toughest sign to successfully ameliorate is a patient’s inability to produce spoken language. Indeed, professionals who have chosen this undertaking will attest to significant challenges. Proven medical protocols are few, though anecdotal ones abound.

The second most difficult expression of ASD is immature conduct, including tantrums. Behavioral intervention is the proven successful treatment. Conventional medical protocols invoke potent pharmaceuticals with significant side effects and variable results, so alternative strategies have emerged.

For years, parents and professionals, alike, have accepted a direct relationship between these two disturbing symptoms. There appears to be general agreement that, as children get older and smarter, they are increasingly frustrated by their failure to adequately communicate. There is a 30-year body of literature that supports this position.

Why were the findings of this paper
so counterintuitive?

This perspective is supported by substantial research, as well. The authors argue, “The reason may in part be because of the effectiveness of interventions… which use behavioral techniques to teach children to use words, and not inappropriate behaviors, to communicate.”

In other words, if language improves through successful therapy, a child may still have tantrums if that issue is not addressed, per se, as well. Those patients who do not get adequate socialization skills continue to resort to outbursts, in order to get needs met.

The publication lacks several key elements. ‘Tantrum’ is used as an outcome measure, begging the question of whether more serious issues, such as self-injury or aggression, were considered in the definition. Medication usage was not documented. Perhaps, patients who were most disruptive received more drugs without relief or even negative side effects? Additional medical issues were, likewise, omitted from the data. In the diverse ASD population, this could be a highly significant variable.

Conclusion
The outcome of this paper could have been that children who have better language skills are more likely to have tantrums! The authors were careful to leave that out. Plus, the closing sentence includes, “Our findings do not diminish the importance of evidence-based interventions…”

If, as the paper asserts, the reason for fewer tantrums was an individual’s type of intervention, then the conclusion seems to be that Functional Communication Therapy is useful for tantrums due to autism.

Or, one might deduce that each individual diagnosed with ASD is so different in their physical and mental state, that there is no certainty, at this time, to explain why this group showed a null relationship.

Is it true? Could tantrums, “… in large part be intrinsic to autism and not driven by developmental processes, such as language.” Is it important? Why? Perhaps, such insight could provide a more effective and efficient window of treatment options. Furthermore, there is general agreement that traditional measures can play an important role in remediation.

An Autism Doctor’s Earliest Signs

Sunday, April 30th, 2017

In spite of an ever-increasing number of atypically developing children, and in the face of a plethora of evidence demonstrating that early intervention results in quicker resolution of problems, pediatricians continue to appear to be more concerned about whether the vaccination schedule is current.

Every day, parents relate stories about a doctor who said, “The child is NOT autistic. He has sensory processing disorder and speech apraxia.””Give it some time,” seems to be a common mantra. Are universities teaching this wait-and-see strategy?

What other medical condition is dealt with in such a fashion? No abnormal mole is considered too tiny to dissect. A small amount of blood coming from any orifice warrants the swiftest investigation. Furthermore, it is generally espoused that early identification and treatment is the best remedial policy, stimulating the appearance of screening programs for cancer and heart disease, for example.

I have examined thousands of high-risk infants, and the younger siblings of many ASD patients over the years. This is my top ten list of physical signs in the first 18 months that should raise suspicion, and demand answers, rather than a dismissive pat on the head, accompanied by a professional’s proclamation, “I wouldn’t worry!”

Your mother thinks that the baby, “… isn’t doing alright.”

There is an inability to successfully breastfeed, especially in highly motived or experienced women. La Leche League has promoted and instructed us all in better ways to get the milk flowing, but a new era of poor suck on the side of the infant has emerged. This could either be the initial sign of a problem, and/or part of a vicious cycle leading to unusual behaviors.

A child who exhibits gastro-esophageal reflux (heartburn), persistent colic, inconsolable crying, and/or severely interrupted sleep patterns may be displaying a red flag. Of course, mild cases could be due to individuality, parental indulgence or ‘milk intolerance’. In this century, think: a condition that deserves investigation, and thoughtful intervention. Prescribing Prevacid is not a workup.

Signs of poor core tone may include a twisted neck, flat head, or delays in motor milestones. In the previous century, doctors were worried about cerebral palsy. Now, it should be considered as a possible earliest sign of autism.

Likewise, the absence of crawling, or persistent ‘army crawl’ has been a documented occurrence in infants who later show ASD.

A breast-fed infant who poops less than twice per day, or a formula fed child who ‘goes’ more than 4 times should raise concern. Unusual stooling often indicates abnormal gut flora, causing direct inflammation and/or additional bacterial changes, and possibly further alters nutrition.

A very early ear infection, or any recurrent medical condition is notable. At the beginning of my 40-year experience with at-risk children, antibiotic use in the first year of life was only a fraction of the exposure that occurs in this century. Investigation of immune competence has everything to do with the modern epidemic, I am certain.

The likelihood of ‘food allergy’ in the first year of life is actually very low. When a pediatrician assigns noisy breathing or fussiness to this presumed ‘diagnosis’, beware that they are not practicing real evidence-based medicine.

After the first few months, infants will look at faces, follow, and later, begin to imitate. If social interactions, such as rolling a ball back-and-forth, do not emerge – and certainly if they disappear – the child needs to have a thorough medical evaluation.

Speech that begins, but does not progress is a worry. When language fades, it is never normal. Period.

Conclusion
Any of these signs could just be a benign variation of normal development. A few are reason for real concern, exploration, and early intervention.

I have presented similar information in previous posts. In addition to these physical signs, I have written about other high-risk situations, and associated factors that assist a physician in ascertaining a specific diagnosis. It sometimes helps to provide regular updates for parents to show their child’s doctor, in order to get things moving on the right track.

FDA Warning About Autism Treatment

Sunday, April 16th, 2017

The FDA took the time, this week (4/2017), to sound an alarm about their notion of potentially dangerous off-label ASD treatments, by issuing, “Autism: Beware of Potentially Dangerous Therapies and Products“.

The consumer update begins, “One thing that is important to know about autism up front: There is no cure for autism. So, products or treatments claiming to “cure” autism do not work as claimed. The same is true of many products claiming to “treat” autism or autism-related symptoms. Some may carry significant health risks.” Really?

What are the approved therapies?
According to the document, the antipsychotic drugs Risperdal (risperidone) and Abilify (aripiprazole) are apparently not considered to be that dangerous. Increased death rates are noted in the Physicians Desk Reference, due to the the former medication. The latter pharmaceutical agent contains this caution, “A causal role has been demonstrated with antidepressant use and emergence of suicidality in pediatric patients and young adults…”

Clinically, patients who have taken these drugs have shown markedly increased appetites (leading to obesity), exhibited new tics, demonstrated a ‘zombie-like’ affect, and have been very difficult to dose correctly. Breast enlargement and lactation have been reported with these meds, as well.

What does the FDA consider dangerous?
About metal-removing therapy, “FDA-approved chelating agents are approved for specific uses that do not include the treatment or cure of autism, such as the treatment of lead poisoning and iron overload, and are available by prescription only.” So, this government organization has determined that environmental poisoning is not a cause of autism.

Hyperbaric oxygen treatment has been cleared by the “FDA only for certain medical uses, such as treating decompression sickness suffered by divers.” The document failed to mention that it has been proven effective for non-healing wounds and post-traumatic stress disorder, as well.

Clay baths, and “… various products, including raw camel milk and essential oils. These products have been marketed as a treatment for autism or autism-related symptoms, but have not been proven safe and effective for these advertised uses.” Don’t expect millions of dollars to be poured into research about the effectiveness of these innocuous interventions.

If you wish to utilize essential oils,
do so at your own peril !

Discussion
The medical literature continues to question the usefulness of Abilify or Risperdal for the treatment of signs and symptoms of ASD. But it is perfectly clear that, even the supporting literature never makes any statement about apraxic children. Stopping the banging doesn’t produce speech. Plus, socialization only improves to the extent that these ‘safe’ drugs reduce unusual behaviors or decrease aggression.

Moreover, the body systems that are in need of repair and optimization do not get addressed – indeed, are even masked – by such a pharmacological bandaid, which leads to further complications. Often, this makes the child with increased resistance to pain even more stuck with their autistic behaviors. Difficulties in the gastrointestinal, immune, and nervous systems, go unrecognized. Mitochondrial functioning is affected, compounding metabolic challenges in this vicious cycle.

Parents seek ‘risky’ therapies because of the inadequacies of the medical profession in just about every aspect of autism diagnosis, prevention, treatment and care. Rather than elevating autism anxiety over the dangers of mostly mild, possibly helpful, but unproven interventions, we would be better served by an honest evaluation about the overuse of the ‘on-label’ products. This is especially true in disadvantaged populations. When functional medicine doctors, such as myself, utilize these drugs, it is usually as a last resort, after explaining risks/benefits to parents, with close follow-up of the patients’ condition.

Conclusion
TV commercials tout incredibly risky medications, for diseases that range from restless leg syndrome to cancer. “Ask your doctor,” we are told, “if this is a good drug for you!” Then, a list of very scary side effects is enumerated. Well, you could just ‘ask your doctor’ if camel milk will cause seizures or death.

Parents of children with developmental challenges have plenty of work to do, just getting through each day. This useless memorandum will, most probably, simply be ignored. For those who feel that the consumer update was produced to pursue some financial and/or political motivation, and/or is another example of bureaucratic waste, you may feel compelled to address the (ir)responsible organization (click here).

Stem Cell Therapy for Autism… cont’d

Sunday, April 9th, 2017

As doctors try to understand and consider various emerging therapies for patients experiencing signs and symptoms of autism, the question of Stem Cell therapy has come to the fore. A Duke University professor barreled onto the scene, recently, with a pronouncement that sounds like a cure, even though it’s not.

Understanding the study
The project is Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Umbilical Cord Blood to Improve Outcomes for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. This was the first phase. The goals were to determine safety, and to evaluate the usefulness of a variety of tests to assess whether the treatment works.

Does giving a child’s own cells, which were collected from the umbilical cord at birth, back into their bloodstream, result in any adverse events? The report broadcast on CNN focused on a 7 year-old who seemed nearly OK, playing with her older, neurotypical sister. The treatment had taken place a couple of years earlier.

Dr. Joanne Kurtzberg, one of the researchers, proclaimed, “We saw improvements in 6 months…” She used the word curative twice in the same sentence, even though her point was ignorance of that outcome. She concluded the interview with, “of course we have to do a placebo controlled randomized trial to answer the question…” The Dad was more realistic, as he commented, “The autism is still there…”

The research involved 25 children, 2 – 6 years old, who had banked cord blood available. “Significant improvements in children’s behavior were observed,” in the majority of children, and “were greater in children with higher baseline nonverbal intelligence quotients.”

“Assessment of adverse events across the 12-month period indicated that the treatment was safe and well tolerated,” claims the abstract. In fact, agitation was a common complaint, requiring additional medications, as the infusion was administered. The authors admitted, “As an uncontrolled open-label study, it is not possible to determine whether the observed behavioral changes were due to the treatment or reflect the natural course of development during the preschool period.”

Discussion
When considering such an extreme treatment, the primary driving force should be the child’s degree of involvement with their developmental challenges. If your youngster is proceeding on an acceptable trajectory, 1) Is it worth the known, and unknown, risks? and, 2) What improvements are you actually seeking? In this study, as in other successful biomedical protocols, the less-affected patients showed the best improvement.

This investigation was done under rigorous conditions by highly trained university personnel, and utilized the patients’ own cord blood. Do stem cell centers around the world offer a similar degree of confidence as regards cleanliness, safety, follow-up, or the ability to handle emergencies? Are outcomes the same when using fat cells that have been turned into stem cells (explained in my previous blogs on this topic)?

The type of autism has got to be a factor, as well. Would a patient with a significant chromosomal variation or metabolic disease, for example, experience the same improvement?

On a positive note, it is encouraging to observe that the conventional research community implicitly concurs that successful treatment involves “modulating inflammatory processes in the brain addressing the reduction of body inflammation to improve ASD.”

Conclusion
We all wish to see a real breakthrough in autism treatment. It appears that stem cell therapy may represent a significant advance. But, that is all that it will represent. Children will still have yeast, and need follow-up labs, and ABA, and Speech therapy. Stem cell intervention seems to represent another, maybe better, certainly more costly, alternative protocol.

Thankfully, Phase II, a randomized, controlled study to assess efficacy, is now underway.

Getting the Most from Behavioral Therapies

Sunday, March 26th, 2017

The ever-increasing number of children who experience significant developmental problems requires a proportional addition of skilled professionals for assessment and intervention.

At The Child Development Center, we have noted the emergence of certain patterns of treatment choices. Intelligent, involved parents express their concern about the paucity of well-trained professionals, the cost of treatment, the lack of insurance, and frustration with the speed or course of their child’s progress.

Applied Behavioral Analysis
The general consensus is that the proven protocols of behavioral intervention are most likely to result in significant symptom reduction in patients with ASD. As reported in the 2001 publicationEducating Children with Autism, “teaching parents how to use pivotal response training as part of their applied behavioral analysis instruction resulted in happier parent-child interactions, more interest by the parents in the interaction, less stress, and a more positive communication style. The use of effective teaching methods for a child with autism can have a measurable positive impact on family stress. As a child’s behavior improves and his or her skills become more adaptive, families have a wider range of leisure options and more time for one another… To realize these gains, parents must continue to learn specialized skills enabling them to meet their child’s needs.”

Why does utilization of ABA lag behind other treatments
in so many regions around the country?

The prevalence of children with autism is outstripping the number of qualified, interested therapists. Economic pressures appear to dictate direct provision of services by paraprofessionals who are properly supervised. Therefore, the most efficient providers frequently observe, evaluate, and mentor the less-experienced staff. For-profit companies may find such practice difficult to maintain.

Insurance companies regularly find a way to weasel out of their commitments, many times in spite of outside mandates or even advertised benefits. Denial of payment for services may take the form of incorrect coding, credentialing, and timeliness of payment. Providers are, therefore, less likely to accept their (lack of) coverage.

There are a variety of types of behavioral intervention; including DTT, EIBI, PRT, VBI, DIR, TEACCH, OT, Sensory Integration Therapy, Speech Therapy, and PECS. Devotees of each claim superiority of their strategy. Such a smorgasbord may confuse even the most attentive parent.

Discussion
Recovery from the major challenges that accompany an autism diagnosis is an exhausting journey for the whole family. Traditional therapies are the proven tools to enable a successful transformation. They are an important consideration that must be offered to every patient. Parents should use their common sense, plus their unique understanding of the child, to assess whether the plan of action really applies. Does the suggested intervention make sense? Does the child ‘click’ with the therapist(s)?

When professionals continue to insist that 1) you are not doing the right thing at home or 2) your child can’t improve in some particular function, it’s imperative to seek additional assistance. Maybe the provider is correct, but little progress will occur if the parties continue to debate.

I often advise parents who are concerned about some ‘magic’ 25-40 hour ABA requirement, that a good OT, or PT, etc., has learned to be effective by utilizing a variety of techniques. Therefore, you can add up the various interventions, and will frequently find that you don’t need to feel guilty about that numeric stipulation.

As children improve, the challenges of proper socialization and self-control become the most difficult and lingering concern. This may require an entirely new and unique skill-set to come to the fore.

Conclusion
All interested professionals; including chiropractors, acupuncturists, alternative and traditional practitioners, can be important members of the village trying to get your child on the right track. Because the present state-of-the-art is in such flux, the correct combination of traditional and alternative protocols provides the best chance for a successful outcome.

A(nother) Laboratory Test(s) for Autism

Sunday, March 19th, 2017

A key piece of the autism puzzle appears to have been confirmed in an article published this week in the Public Library of Science Open Access Journal, Computational Biology. The title of the article is Classification and adaptive behavior prediction of children with autism spectrum disorder based upon multivariate data analysis of markers of oxidative stress and DNA methylation.

The news has already been reported in popular media as “A Blood Test for Autism“. Here is my clinical interpretation.

The Study
The data was collected from patients in previous studies, and included 83 children, aged 3-10 years, with ASD. Utilizing very dense, complicated statistics that were based on biochemical laboratory data, researchers identified neurotypical vs. autistic individuals, who already had the diagnosis, based on conventional developmental testing.

The chosen pathways evaluated abnormalities in methylation, an epigenetic function, and detoxification.

Specificity and sensitivity were very reliable, “96.1% of all neurotypical participants being correctly identified as such while still correctly identifying 97.6% of the ASD cohort.”

Discussion
Contrary to what the headlines proclaim, this is not a single test; it’s research material that is based on a number of not-yet-readily-available laboratory findings.

The biomarkers represent a final common pathway, not necessarily a cause. Although the data correlated with autism ‘scores’, it really wasn’t meant to discriminate for the various kinds of developmental challenges, such as those children who are mostly aggressive, immune, apraxic, or suffer gastrointestinal abnormalities.

Such an analysis begs the question, “Can it be used for prospective improvement – to follow course of the condition?”

Conclusion
The modern epidemic of childhood autism is extremely complicated and difficult to pin down for research purposes. This study renders a modern means to evaluate a myriad of variables. The metabolic pathways under scrutiny represent a confirmation of the roles of genes and toxins.

As with other ‘earliest diagnosis’ studies, this paper serves to solidify the concept that earlier diagnosis should lead to earlier interventions, with improved outcomes.

For those of us who are practicing ‘alternative’ medicine, it is comforting to rediscover that the treatments included in our modern arsenal of biomedical protocols are consistent with these findings.

Medical Academy of Pediatric Special Needs Spring 2017 Conference

Sunday, March 12th, 2017

At the conference with Yale prof Dr. Sid Baker – one of the originators of biomedical treatment

If practitioners wish to become more effective in the diagnosis and treatment of children who suffer developmental challenges, it will require a new paradigm. Therefore, attending conferences, such as the Simons Foundation for Autism Research, the Autism Research Institute, and the Medical Academy of Pediatric Special Needs, is essential to acquiring that knowledge.

This year’s advanced sessions introduced a completely new functional medicine topic – Hormones from Pregnancy to Teens. Dr. Cindy Schneider examined the differences between the brain anatomy, physiology, and chemistry that might explain how ASD affects males vs. females, and the consequences as we age. Additionally, there are the special complications incurred throughout puberty, with important implications regarding effective treatments.

Dr. Stephen Genuis‘ presentations, Hormone Disrupting Agents, provided a fascinating complement to that lecture. He highlighted the chronic nature of ASD, and the disrupting effects of toxic agents in our modern environment. A key component is the toxic load; if topical agents represent ounces, ingested compounds represent pounds, and the air that we breathe can be expressed in tons of potential poisonous compounds. And, it takes months or years to eliminate what takes days or weeks to ingest. He also pointed out that medical school curricula and training in toxicology is woefully inadequate.

Dr. Lynne Mielke rounded out the day by submitting actual case histories of young people with mysterious medical problems. Her background includes personal experience, extensive knowledge and patient care. This physician’s psychiatric/neurological point-of-view was especially insightful and provided valuable material that directly applied to the audience’s practice population.

Day 2
Another novel and exciting topic was Preconception Care: A New Standard of Care in Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Dr. Genuis discussed the increased risks of preterm birth, Caesarian section delivery, and chronic childhood illness, such as cancers, diabetes, autoimmune conditions, autism and  ADHD.
He presented the emerging research of toxicant exposures and nutritional deficiencies that continue to escalate. Metabolic disruptions may easily ensue, leading to many of the persistent disorders that are now experienced by an increasing number of children, although they may look perfectly normal at birth.

Such difficulties seem imminently preventable in the population, and there appears to be a lack of awareness in the majority of obstetricians. Even fathers who are exposed to toxic agents may become a vector for such later difficulties. Dr. Genuis then discussed the means to eliminate the myriad of  toxins – mostly by sweating, but some by other means, such as fasting or medication.

Dr. Elizabeth Mumper followed with an in-depth discussion about the lack of awareness of proper nutrition, environmental factors, the hazards of indiscriminate use of antibiotics, and poorly researched vaccinations, which appear to be significant factors leading to autism. She even offered another alternative schedule for high-risk infants and toddlers.

Nutritionist Robert Miller presented a very dense lecture, attempting to answer the complicated question, “What can be done about all of those new-fangled genetics tests?” Suffice it to say, that offering will take some time to digest.

Day 3
The lectures consisted of an assortment of the faculty’s most difficult cases. Experts included Drs. Baker, Frye, and Neuenschwander; and the audience wasn’t too shabby, either. Case histories were offered about families who experience unimaginable, incomprehensible challenges; from self-mutilation, to children attempting suicide (sometimes, successfully), to attacks on their caregivers.

The take-home items from such discussions are simply, “How can we prevent this, and successfully treat our population?”

Conclusion
It’s fortuitous that Dr. Ratajczek’s article, which examined the research about vaccine safety, was published at the time of this seminar. Participants have been wringing our hands about the ‘disconnect’ between what we (and many parents) experience every day, and conventional medicine’s dogma. The article might act as fuel-to-the-fire for some, be ignored by the majority, but represents some slight measure of vindication for our hard-working tribe.

We are getting only marginally closer to our understanding about the cause(s), treatment(s), and prevention(s) for autism. Much more research is needed. The Medical Academy of Pediatric Special Needs provides a valuable platform for presenting, evaluating, and disseminating such expertise.

Fecal Transplants and Autism Therapies

Sunday, January 29th, 2017

Recent media attention about a study involving a small group of children with ASD, who were treated with a specific protocol that included fecal transplantation, has spawned a slew of questions about this complicated protocol.
TheAutismDoctor response (so far):

What do these other autism therapies have in common?

•Probiotics – healthy bacteria (and, sometimes yeast).
•Prebiotics – food that fosters better bacteria.
•Special diets- nourishment that helps to reduce toxins, bad bacteria, or yeast.
Helminth therapy – administering live intestinal parasites into a patient’s stomach to reset the micro-biome.
Digestive enzymes – fostering more complete breakdown of foodstuff. This includes CM-AT powder; an experimental protocol utilizing “… a proprietary enzyme that is designed as a granulated powder taken three times daily.”
Turmeric, resveratrol, acai, and other antioxidants.
•Anti-fungal and antibacterial medications and supplements.

RIGHT! They all contribute to improved gastrointestinal health.

What else do they have in common?

•Physicians who explore and treat the enteric system to reduce negative behaviors know the success of such a protocol. However, this view is not a popular subject in the scientific literature, nor commonly accepted by the conventional medical community.
•Such interventions are generally short lived, with frequent recurrences.
•Improvements may seem to diminish with subsequent treatment.

Even hyperbaric oxygen therapy, stem cell therapy, chlorine dioxide, and chemical chelation may achieve their gains through this pathway.

How do they differ?

•Some protocols make some patients better, some have no effect, some produce adverse effects.
•Some are relatively inexpensive, other may cost thousands of dollars.
•They achieve change by a variety of biome-altering methods.

What is a Fecal transplant?

•Simply put, this treatment involves taking fecal material from a healthy individual, and transferring it into another individual’s intestines, by a variety of means, including pills, naso-gastric tubes, and colonoscopy. The procedure was first documented more than 60 years ago.

•For severe gastrointestinal problems in adults, the procedure was reviewed earlier in this century in the journal Clinical Gastroenterology. “This form of therapy has now reached primetime and should be used in any patient that has been resistant to therapy of recurrent attacks.”

What was this research?

•18 children, aged 7-16 years, with ASD and moderate to severe GI problems, were subjected to a “… modified <fecal microbiota transfer> protocol… involved 14 days of oral <antibiotic> treatment followed by… fasting with bowel cleansing, then repopulating gut microbiota by administering a high initial dose of Standardized Human Gut Microbiota… either orally or rectally followed by daily, lower maintenance oral doses with <antacids> for 7–8 weeks… Participants were followed for an additional 8 weeks after treatment ended…”

•”Substantial changes in GI and ASD symptoms were observed…  and those improvements were maintained after 8 weeks of no treatment… Only two… were designated as non-responders…”

Discussion
The authors in this paper noted that, “… it appears likely that extended treatment… over many weeks, as done in this study, is necessary to observe these benefits.” They concluded that, “While this study was an open-label trial that is subject to placebo effects, these results are promising and provide a crucial step for understanding the connection between the microbiome and ASD. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study is the next step to investigate the value of Microbiota Transfer Therapy in treating children with ASD and GI problems.”

For the foreseeable future, Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) will not be covered under health insurance. Presently, the cost for eradication of Clostridia difficile (a common organism that causes severe bowel disease) exceeds $3000 for short term treatment.

Conclusions
FMT represents a promising remedy for many of the disruptive behaviors that patients may exhibit. At the very least, it assists in heightening the awareness of the gut-brain connection, especially in ASD.

While parents are all desperate for a cure, this may simply represent another link in the chain that points to gut health as a major contributor of signs and symptoms involved in one type of autism. More research about this therapy needs to be undertaken before safety and efficacy can be assured.

Because of the required resources and time, it will take a while for this treatment to take hold, even by doctors who specialize in this type of patient.

As an increasing number of parents wish to explore this option, with practitioners who are available to work with them, valuable information will be gained for the multitude of other families who seek relief from this modern developmental disorder.

Practicing Pediatric Special Needs Medicine

Sunday, December 11th, 2016
staff2016

(L-R) Karen, Lisa, Dr. Udell, Isabella, Dr. Sherry, Ashly (Front) Julian & Jovi

I’m not a big fan of posting patient testimonials. Fake news is in the news, and it’s pervasive. Plus, it seems unlikely that any practitioner would post negative information about their own practice.

On the other hand, many Googlers, my wife included, see such information as valuable insight into how the doctor practices. Readers may gain confidence that a visit could be a worthwhile pursuit. Here is a sample of this year’s correspondence at The Child Development Center:

Feeding
It is now 4 weeks since she started accepting solids foods, both during feeding therapy and at home. I was so exited that I decided to lower her puree intake as the days kept passing; to the point she was on straight solids for the past 2 weeks.
She is also talking way more than ever, which it is also a change that occurred at the same time she started eating solids. She is expressing herself in 2- 3 word sentences.

We are happy that the unusual behavioral issues receded and please send us the gluten-free letter so the nurses office can have it on file as they need it.

Speech
My child is doing well. He started singing and talking more, but his stomach is bloated for a few days already, any suggestions?

Yes, she is babbling more and using more consonant sounds.

She is doing well in her ABA and lets talk program.  She is reading short phrases and spontaneously saying one to three words with some cueing.  Saying more than 50 words and singing a bit.

She is babbling more and  is now mimicking certain animal sounds…in her own way. 🙂 She  is  also practicing no and is babbling a lot under her breath. She is not saying any words consistently, but I feel like we’re almost there.

I have amazing news to report. I am not sure if it is coincidence, but I put him on a very strict Gluten free/Casein free/Soy free/Sugar free diet this past Saturday he started talking!!!! He is mostly repeating when I prompt him, most of the language is prompted and a lot of it is not completely clear, you can make out what he is saying though. Very similar to when a child first starts talking. He has said in excess of 70 new words in the past 2 days, not including words he is repeating!!!! I am so excited.

The child is saying Mom and Dad in context!!!! She’s been  practicing both for a few days and now says it when she sees us…

Methyl B12 injections
That would be great if you could check if we previously tested for MTHFR. If not, I think I’d like to test for it… Also is there a way to further check for B12 deficiency?

She is doing great with her b12 shots in combination with folinic acid. I noticed improvements after the first shot.

Naltrexone
… We also decided to continue with the LDN because we believe it’s working. It seems as most of the remaining “fog” has lifted, he’s more social, more aware, has better eye contact and his processing seems better (even though there’s still room for improvement)…

He has been taking the Naltrexone nearly a month now. I do see improvement as far as expression and vocalizing full sentences when asked a question. I also feel his vocabulary has also expanded.  It may not be drastic but I feel he has improved since he has been taking the Naltrexone.

We are at 6 weeks of LDN. This has been the key it seems like. It seems in the past week vocabulary has been off the charts! It’s great! One thing I can recommend is the pharmacy makes a big difference.

Health
Just wanted to let you know that my child is doing great. I noticed his cholesterol finally went up to 157. He is labeling now, he started asking with his words for juice, cookie, outside etc. every day a new word. The school therapist came out to tell me how he is like a different child. He is responding to give me hi fives. I just wanted to thank you for bringing him back. He is such a smart little guy and I can see his little personality emerging. He is even fighting back his big sister when she takes his toy away.

I think he is doing well with the Levothyroxine 37.5 mcg. Maybe you can ask for 25mcg 2x a day so they don’t give me 50mcg pills. 

Started NAC 2 weeks ago. First week with 1 capsule. She responded very well. We noticed increased receptive skills, more independence, increase ability to answer questions and more spontaneous speech. She also has not had any accidents since we started (potty). No negative behaviors or stimming was noted. I started 2 capsules on week 2. First day great. Second day increased irritability… 

I had this urge to share this info with you this morning, partly because it’s so positive and also because we are seeing things we’ve never seen, since he’s been on the Vyvanse.  The picture is of him playing soccer with his dad this morning, after he made his own scrambled eggs for the first time. This is a first!
He just seems a lot more motivated and wants to do more things.
In general, a lot of improvements to celebrate. The downside, which you did mention to me were all spot on. For him it’s loss of appetite (positive, oops) and also he is very emotional. Any little issue can set him off and have him in tears.
His teacher briefly mentioned seeing improvements too, more calm and focused.
So, so far so good and I feel like I made the right decision in giving meds a go.

Following your advice, I asked the neurologist to do a new VEEG. Guess what..! You was absolutely right…! He’s still having seizures internally, even though they’re not perceived to the eyes…..the activity is mostly coming from his brain left side… The doctor also asked me for your email address to get in touch with you and provide you with more detailed information…Ps. I feel blessed for having you as my son’s doctor…

Sleep
Clonidine did not work in keeping him asleep. We tried it for 2 weeks with no success. Discontinued. Benadryl with melatonin is what we’re giving him now. It helps him fall asleep very easily, although kept him asleep about 50% of the time. He’d wake around 2-3 am looking for mom or dad and have difficulty falling back asleep. We’ve started locking him in his room at night after bedtime routine (with melatonin and benedryl and picture schedules) and he’s stayed asleep the last 2 nights! 12 hrs last night! Fingers crossed for continued success.

He slept all night and is happy and full of energy today. Thank you!

Sensory
I wanted to tell you what the child did today. Taking him for a haircut is a horrific experience. We are all on the floor holding him down – 4 of us- while he struggles and screams. It has always been like this. Well, today, I took him myself to the barbershop… He walked in and went right to the chair and got up there and put the apron over his lap.  I sat down and pretended to read magazine. Praying!   The two barbers ( one cut, the other stood in front of him) and started using clippers. He sat there and did great!!! 15 minutes total – we were in and back out in the car!!  I never even got up out if chair!!  A miracle!   Hair looks great!!  Can you believe it!!  I’m so thrilled!!

He is actively engaging all his OT/SP skills daily to which EVERYONE that knows him is astounded by the change in him.

You don’t have to write me back but from the first day,  Neuroprotek has made a difference! I’ll keep you posted,  thanks so much. 🙂

Yeast
He’s back on diflucan for almost 2 weeks now and overall much better.

We have seen tremendous improvement since starting the Fluconazole last week. The child has been more engaged and is no longer stuck in his room playing with only his trucks. He is much more vocal, interactive and responsive to his environment and we have had many playful back and forth conversations and games with him. His articulation has improved also, and I can understand him again. He is talking more, initiating more and analyzing his surroundings and comments from other people in the house!

He is doing a lot better!!!! His stomach seems to be much better anyways and much happier guy overall. I actually got the diflocan filled only today so I will touch base in the next few days. I love you all and I’m so grateful that my child is in the right hands now and on his way to great things.

Poop
Ever since we started the vitamin c , his poop is soft and easy to push out.

… Our child has been doing quite well. She is now TOTALLY potty-trained and is doing well at her new school which is accommodating her in inclusive classes. So now we are focusing on her speech. 

She had a great soft BM within just a few hours of the first dose of the lactulose. She was so happy she shouted Yay! Thank you again Dr Udell!  We are so glad to have you in our life!

This evening he went to the bathroom. A full size sample. I attached a photo. (I get lots of pictures of BMs).

Education
Sending you some pictures of the homeschool room.  We started on 1/4/16.  My child was able to sit through 3 1/2 minutes of calendar time on that day.  As of today, she is up to 19 minutes of calendar time, with a goal for the year of 20 minutes.

The teacher told me today that for the first time he asked for water, fully engaged with the class and the activities, play in the kitchen – he made pizza and served his classmate, fully verbal interact… she put tears in my eyes.

Just wanted to send you a video of him reading (“memorized”) the brown bear book. He’s talking a lot and wanted to share. Hope all is well.

Wanted to share great news. He scored above average in Reading Comprehension and average in Math. He was promoted to first grade with no issues. Next year he will be in a Gen Ed classroom for 90minutes, 5 days a week. He will also share specials and events with his Gen Ed class.
We would like to thank Dr Udell and his wonderful caring team! We feel blessed!

Guidance & Communication
Thank you for all your help and advice…

I will be so grateful thank you so much for all of your guidance and help my chid is doing much better each day and I know this journey is going in the right path.

Let me know your thoughts.  Thanks again Dr. Udell.  I am so grateful for your dedication and knowledge.

Dr. Udell – thank you for getting back to us so soon. I will communicate with the office tomorrow.

Thank you for always keeping my child’s best interest at heart.

Thank you for all you do for my little girl and for the rest of your patients!
I have referred you many times in past few months because I believe you are saving so many kids when no one else will.

You need to be a part of a contest for one of the highest quality websites
on the net. I’m going to recommend this site!

Conclusions
Of course, not all of our work results in such positive stories. However, by answering the calls and emails, and staying up-to-date with the science and the families, we continue to have an increasing number of children who experience improvement, if not complete resolution, of their childhood developmental challenges.

Many thanks to my amazing families, the patients, and our wonderful, caring staff.

Categories Archives Links Contact Us

Brian D. Udell MD
6974 Griffin Road
Davie
FL 33314
Office phone – 954-873-8413
Fax – 954-792-2424

Email bdumd@childdev.org
Copyright © TheAutismDoctor.com 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015
All Rights Reserved